Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Wesley v. The City of Lynchburg et al
as 6:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Calvin Wesley
Defendant:
The City of Lynchburg, LPD Officer Seth Reed, LPD Officer Austin Rowland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rowland v. Parson et al
as 7:2019cv00010
Defendant:
Sherriff Parson and Deputy Jeff Smith
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher et al v. Land and Sea Restaurant Company, LLC
as 7:2018cv00512
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Johns, Jeffry Fisher, Tiffany Davidson and others
Defendant:
Land and Sea Restaurant Company, LLC and Land and Sea Restaurant Company, LLC d/b/a Frankie Rowland's Steakhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Rowland v. Bledsoe et al
as 7:2018cv00391
Defendant:
Kiser, B. Witt, J. Artrip and others
Plaintiff:
Cordaro A. W. Rowland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowland v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2010cv00032
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Gary W. Rowland
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Saunders v. Matthews et al
as 7:2008cv00487
Plaintiff:
David E. Saunders
Defendant:
R. Matthews, Rowland, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Mayfield v. Henderson County Detention Center et al
as 7:2008cv00331
Plaintiff:
Howard Bradley Mayfield
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention Center, Rowland, Summers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Austin v. Henderson County Detention Center
as 7:2008cv00319
Plaintiff:
Roger Allen Austin, Jr.
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention Center, Ron Harrington and Rowland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gomez-Navarro v. Rowland et al
as 7:2008cv00192
Plaintiff:
Antonio Gomez-Navarro
Defendant:
Randolph Watts Rowland, Terry J. Dowdy, The City of Roanoke Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
