Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kiser v. Carlton et al
as 7:2021cv00455
Plaintiff:
Brandon Darrell Kiser
Defendant:
Howard Carlton, Tom Dooley and Dr. Josef
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Toms v. Commissioner Of Social Security
as 6:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Dale Toms
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cook v. Vazax Dining, LLC et al
as 7:2019cv00781
Plaintiff:
Eric Lamont Cook
Defendant:
Tom Wayne Noelke, Vazax Dining, LLC and Vazax Dining Two, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Scott v. Mcclung et al
as 7:2019cv00570
Defendant:
Judge Hines, Boyd, Judge Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Vilsack
as 7:2013cv00026
Plaintiff:
Arthur K. Davis
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
South End Construction, Inc. v. Tom Brunton Masonry, Inc.
as 7:2012cv00390
Counter Defendant:
South End Construction, Inc.
Plaintiff:
South End Construction, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Tom Brunton Masonry, Inc.
Defendant:
Tom Brunton Masonry, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Dowdy v. Louisa County et al
as 7:2012cv00308
Defendant:
Ashley Davenport, Ashland Fortune, Tom Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ryland Dowdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dowdy v. Louisa County et al
as 7:2012cv00041
Defendant:
Ashley Davenport, Ashland Fortune, Tom Garrett and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Ryland Dowdy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.