Cases 1 - 10 of 719
Andrews v. United States Inc. et al
as 7:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Joshua Wayne Andrews
Defendant:
United States Inc., Federal Registry, Vital Records and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Waldron v. Streeval et al
as 7:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Rondell Waldron
Defendant:
J.C. Streeval, USP Lee, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hartsfield v. United States Army
as 3:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Scott Hartsfield
Defendant:
United States Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nance v. United States Of America
as 7:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Peter Michael Nance
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Murray v. United States Department of Justice
as 7:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
William O. Murray, III
Defendant:
United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
White v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Barry G. White
Defendant:
Christopher M. Cummings and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Young v. United States
as 7:2024cv00189
Petitioner:
Kareem Young
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
M.B. v. United States of America, et. al.
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
M.B.
Defendant:
United States of America, J.C. Streeval, Dr. Kareem Wasim, PsyD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
