Cases 1 - 10 of 373
Richards v. X. Corp
as 5:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Thomas Richards
Defendant:
X. Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anderson v. Thomas
as 7:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
Alexis Anderson
Defendant:
Lt. P. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. National Life Insurance Company et al
as 7:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Thomas Matthews
Defendant:
National Life Insurance Company and Real Innovation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Huffman v. Baker
as 7:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Jullian Huffman
Defendant:
Judge Thomas W. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Baker
as 7:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Huffman
Defendant:
Judge Thomas W. Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards v. X. Corp et al
as 5:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Thomas Richards
Defendant:
X. Corp and Elon Musk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Navarro et al v. United States Center for SafeSport et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Thomas Navarro, James Giorgio and Nina Shaffer
Defendant:
United States Center for SafeSport, United States Olympic & Paralympic Committee and United States Equestrian Federation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Thomas v. Dotson
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Timothy James Thomas
Respondent:
Chadwick Dotson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lipscomb v. Slonaker et al
as 7:2024cv00250
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Lipscomb
Defendant:
Katlynn Slonaker, Caroline Helsley, Amber Dopkowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Short v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Tazewell et al
as 7:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Thomas Short
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority, Tazewell, Dr. Crystal Large and Nurse Kayla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
