Cases 1 - 10 of 486
Johnson v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mae Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Borba v. Kijakazi
as 4:2023cv05072
Plaintiff:
Stacy Borba
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kegle v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00148
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kegle
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
King v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
ANGELA HELEN KING
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Belgarde v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Brittany Danielle Belgarde
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Lumpkin v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03001
Plaintiff:
Ralph M Lumpkin III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rowe v. Saul
as 1:2021cv03047
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Roy Rowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Todd v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00279
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Jeanie Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anthony v. Saul
as 2:2019cv00274
Plaintiff:
Robert B Anthony
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.