Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rodriguez v. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2022cv00144
Plaintiff:
Penny Rodriguez
Defendant:
Israel Rodriguez, State of Washington, Department of Social and Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Teeman et al v. State of Washington DSHS et al
as 1:2016cv03040
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Teeman and Andrea Joy Lyons
Defendant:
State of Washington DSHS , Staci Foster , Doreen Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disability Rights Washington v. Weeping Ridge Estate Adult Famly Home Inc.
as 2:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights Washington
Defendant:
Weeping Ridge Estate Adult Family Home Inc and Israel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teeman et al v. Department of Social and Health Services
as 1:2015cv03138
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Teeman and Andrea Joy Lyons
Defendant:
Department of Social and Health Services , Child Protective Services , Claudia Rocha Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801 Farmworker Rights
Wright et al v. Moses Lake, City of et al
as 2:2008cv00250
Plaintiff:
Joel Wright, Gloria Lisa Wright, E.W. and others
Defendant:
Moses Lake, City of, Juan Rodriguez, Jane Doe Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. City of Moses Lake et al
as 2:2007cv00329
Plaintiff:
Leticia Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of Moses Lake, Brett A. Bastian and Jane Doe Bastian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
