Cases 91 - 100 of 15,592
Corby v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
Ricky Corby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Schonebaum v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Asa Lee Schonebaum
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Matson v O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Wesley A Matson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Suarez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Felipe Suarez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Littlefield v. Splawn et al
as 1:2024cv03057
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edwin Littlefield
Defendant:
B Splawn, Lt T Irion, Lt E Coxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Littlefield v. State of Washington et al
as 1:2024cv03056
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edwin Littlefield
Defendant:
State of Washington, Yakima County Chief Splawn, Yakima County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stockton et al v. Ferguson et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
John Stockton, Richard Eggleston, Thomas T Siler and others
Defendant:
Robert Ferguson, Kyle S Karinen and John and Jane Does MDs 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Krebs v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03058
Plaintiff:
Nathan Krebs
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rodriguez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03059
Plaintiff:
Francis Joe Rodriguez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
