Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Estate of Jason Poss et al v. Gately et al
as 2:2012cv00456
Plaintiff:
Estate of Jason Poss , Michael Poss and Geraldine Poss
Defendant:
Kellee Gately , Jason Curtis and City of Spokane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. Curtis et al
as 2:2012cv05047
Plaintiff:
Eddie J Combs
Defendant:
Arthur D Curtis and Steve Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Stockwell et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
Lance Charles Anderson
Defendant:
William Stockwell, Jack Richardson, Kenneth Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estes v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2011cv05158
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Estes
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Kathy Gastreich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Beito v. City of Airway Heights et al
as 2:2010cv00432
Plaintiff:
Curtis N Beito
Defendant:
City of Airway Heights , Chief of Police , Lee Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
as 2:2010cv00320
Plaintiff:
Curtis J Cook
Defendant:
Bishop White Marshall & Weibel PS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Holden et al
as 2:2010cv03038
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Curtis T Holden and Advanced Podiatry Specialists PS
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Beito v. Spokane County Div. of Risk Management et al
as 2:2010cv00102
Plaintiff:
Curtis Neil Beito
Defendant:
Spokane County Div. of Risk Management, Spokane Co Sheriffs and Ozzie Knezovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beito v. Spokane County Sheriffs et al
as 2:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Curtis Neil Beito
Defendant:
Spokane County Sheriffs and Spokane County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
