Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00232
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kim v. City of Sunnyside
as 1:2023cv03012
Defendant:
The City of Sunnyside, a Municipal Corporation, City of Sunnyside and Yakima County Superior Court
Plaintiff:
Helen Kim doing business as Townhouse Motel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bartlett v. Hazel et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Douglas Alan Bartlett
Defendant:
Judge Tony Hazel, Commissioner Tammy Chavez, Attorney Gary Stenzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv05033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Heimlich et al
as 2:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Cobbina Osei-Fosu and Brandako Inc
Defendant:
Caleb Heimlich, Olga Farnam, Marlene Pfeifer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hempstract Inc v. Haynes et al
as 2:2021cv00258
Plaintiff:
Hempstract Inc
Defendant:
Gregory Haynes and Kim Melbye
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Robertson v. Dorn et al
as 2:2021cv00064
Plaintiff:
Alan D Robertson
Defendant:
Desjardins General Insurance Group doing business as Certas Home and Auto Insurance Company, Lorne A Dorn and Kim Dorn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Webb v. Cinclair et al
as 2:2020cv00067
Defendant:
Kim Gutholm, Giang Ly Tran, Joshua Wolff and others
Plaintiff:
Dionte T Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv05040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
