Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc. et al v. McKenna
as 2:2011cv03018
Plaintiff:
King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc and Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation
Defendant:
Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Boteilho v. Frakes et al
as 2:2011cv00019
Petitioner:
Anthony J Boteilho
Respondent:
Scott Frakes and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Karnath v. Gregoire et al
as 2:2010cv05098
Plaintiff:
James Karnath
Defendant:
Christine Gregoire, Eldon Vail, Richard Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Silva v. Gregoire et al
as 2:2010cv05010
Plaintiff:
Matthew G Silva
Defendant:
Christine Gregoire, Rob McKenna, Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Glebe et al
as 2:2009cv00295
Petitioner:
Michael T Daniels
Respondent:
Patrick Glebe and Rob McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2009cv00258
Plaintiff:
Naathon-Ray Johnson
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Corrections, Washington State Attorney Generals Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gladney v. McKenna et al
as 2:2009cv05070
Petitioner:
Trause Gladney
Respondent:
Rob McKenna and Jeff Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Klym v. Vail et al
as 2:2009cv05041
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dale Klym
Respondent:
Eldon Vail, Stolc and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. McKenna
as 2:2009cv00143
Petitioner:
Michael E Peterson
Respondent:
Rob M McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
