Cases 81 - 90 of 4,162
Hill v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2023cv05890
Plaintiff:
Horace Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Schmidt, Joseph Barnett, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jolon-Puac v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv05914
Plaintiff:
Julio Puac-Jolon and Julio Jolon-Puac
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Corrections, Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickens v. NaphCare
as 3:2023cv05934
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Dickens
Defendant:
NaphCare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickens v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05876
Plaintiff:
Joshua A Dickens
Defendant:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbray v. Horne et al
as 3:2023cv05841
Plaintiff:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Defendant:
Gerarld A Horne and Pierce County Prosecuting Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris et al v. Kent Police Department Detective et al
as 2:2023cv01510
Plaintiff:
Dwight Harris
Defendant:
Kent Police Department Detective, Vancouver SWAT Team, King County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gossett v. Gailfus et al
as 3:2023cv05850
Plaintiff:
Mark Jonathan Gossett
Defendant:
Terri J Gailfus, Edward Holm, Margrete Holm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Barron et al
as 2:2023cv01530
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Zdenek Davis
Defendant:
Barron, Weaver, Maher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. Mason County et al
as 3:2023cv05809
Plaintiff:
Zachary Boyce
Defendant:
Mason County, Kevin Hanson, John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Noort et al
as 3:2023cv05923
Plaintiff:
Horace Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Erika Noort, Rachelle Carelock and Phil Ard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
