Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Trevino et al v. Quigley et al
as 2:2018cv00487
Plaintiff:
Francis Anthony Trevino and Mark Newton Kelly
Defendant:
Kevin W. Quigley, Gregory D. Sypolt, James M. Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Doe v. Grays Harbor County et al
as 3:2017cv05186
Plaintiff:
Theresa Doe
Defendant:
Grays Harbor County , Gerald Murphy , Greg Reynvaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bykov v. Rosen et al
as 2:2015cv00713
Plaintiff:
Vladik Bykov
Defendant:
Steven Rosen, Micheline Murphy, Brian Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05210
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01843
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Murphy v. Whatcom County, Washington et al
as 2:2013cv00727
Plaintiff:
Paul Murphy
Defendant:
Whatcom County, Washington , Whatcom County Sheriff's Department and William J Elfo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warner et al v. Dill et al
as 2:2011cv02150
Plaintiff:
Julia Warner and Dan Warner
Defendant:
Marcus Dill, R. Murphy and Snohomish County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edland et al v. Edland et al
as 3:2008cv05222
Plaintiff:
Eural Dewayne Debbs and Lyndsy Edland
Defendant:
Paul Edland, Robert Edland, Marion Edland and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murphy et al v. Sackman et al
as 2:2008cv00555
Plaintiff:
Michael Murphy and Steven Gosline
Defendant:
Greg W Sackman, Scott Elliott, Gil Kerlikowske and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
