Cases 71 - 80 of 86
United States of America v. Kroack
as 2:2011cv00432
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John C Kroack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramirez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ocegueda v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00018
Plaintiff:
Beatriz Ocegueda
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv05793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv01290
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ramirez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dualeh et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00875
Plaintiff:
Ali M Dualeh, Ali M Dualeh, Jawaher Shreh and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Robert Brooks, Ban Tien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jama v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Habibo A Jama and Habibo A Jama
Defendant:
United States of America, City of Seattle, City of Tukwila and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
United States of America v. King County Washington et al
as 2:2009cv00059
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, United States of America and others
Defendant:
King County Washington and Ron Sims
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Roy v. Adirondack Medical Center et al
as 2:2008cv00918
Plaintiff:
Lisa N Roy
Defendant:
Adirondack Medical Center and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Keyter v. United States of America
as 3:2008cv05235
Plaintiff:
Anthony P Keyter
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
