Cases 101 - 110 of 8,923
Ritenburgh v. Clark County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv05185
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ritenburgh
Defendant:
Clark County Jail, Clark County Sheriff's Office, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dominguez
as 2:2024cv00051
Petitioner:
Franklin C Smith
Respondent:
Levi Dominguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. Lanum et al
as 3:2024cv05034
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams
Defendant:
Bruce Lanum, Adam Clarino, Tony Donnington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bateman v. Hawk et al
as 2:2024cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Bateman
Defendant:
Jason Hawk, Robert Melvin, City of Newcastle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
David Butler
Defendant:
Suzane Bigelow and King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willoughby v. Sherwood et al
as 2:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Thomas Willoughby
Defendant:
Kyle Sherwood, Seatac Federal Detention Center and Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Cole-Tindall
as 2:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
Brandon T Gates
Respondent:
Patti Cole-Tindall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Stites v. Strange et al
as 3:2024cv05027
Plaintiff:
Jeremie David Stites
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange and Joyce Lingle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberson v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00241
Petitioner:
Neil James Roberson
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ptah v. Berger et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Malek Kalid Ptah
Defendant:
Franke Berger, Brad Bales and Mark B Tackitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
