Cases 131 - 140 of 8,954
Brown v. Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Dranoel Enaj Brown
Defendant:
Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Feola v. Perkins
as 3:2024cv05078
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Feola
Respondent:
Jefferey Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniels v. Young et al
as 3:2024cv05077
Plaintiff:
Devon Marteen Daniels
Defendant:
Brian Young, John Ringer and Mary Robinette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Coleman et al
as 2:2024cv00129
Defendant:
Tina McCraw, Suzan Coleman, John Hurt and others
Plaintiff:
Tayjuan Trevion-Wayne Fletcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gargar v. Thompson
as 2:2024cv00128
Petitioner:
Abdulkadir Osman Gargar
Respondent:
State of Washington and Mark Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Bigelow et al
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
David Butler
Defendant:
Suzane Bigelow and King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bones et al v H.I.G. Capital LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Sarah Bones, T. G. and C. G.
Defendant:
H.I.G. Capital, LLC., Wellpath, County of Clallam and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Sayidin v. Warner
as 2:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
Mahamad Hussein Sayidin
Respondent:
Jack Warner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouse v. Hansen et al
as 3:2024cv05068
Plaintiff:
Rusty Lee Rouse
Defendant:
Kevin Hansen, David Guidrey, Randy Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbray v. Bennett
as 2:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Dennis Derise Corbray
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
