Cases 11 - 20 of 207
Howell v. Shadywoods et al
as 3:2023cv05143
Plaintiff:
Michelle Howell
Defendant:
Shadywoods, Tom Griffen, John and Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paul v. Prisco et al
as 3:2022cv05940
Plaintiff:
Philip A Paul and Tom Anderson
Defendant:
Andy Prisco, Nathan Savage, Edwin Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gimbel v. Bezos et al
as 2:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
Francis Gimbel, Jr. and Francis Gimbel, Jr
Defendant:
Jeffrey P Bezos, Andrew R Jassy, Brian T Olsavsky and others
Nominal Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Nelson v. Bezos et al
as 2:2022cv00559
Plaintiff:
Stephen G Nelson
Defendant:
Jeffrey P Bezos, Andrew Jassy, Brian T Olsavsky and others
Nominal Defendant:
Amazon.com Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Francis Gimbel, Jr
Consolidated Defendant:
Nate Sutton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Jones et al v. Puyallup Tribe et al
as 3:2022cv05222
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jones, Charles Jones and Tom Jones
Defendant:
Puyallup Tribe, Washington State Capitol, Bank Tapco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. Minnkowski
as 3:2022cv05047
Plaintiff:
Tom Clegg Gibson
Defendant:
Minnkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Landry v. Thomas et al
as 2:2021cv01669
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Landry
Defendant:
Mark Thomas, Jane Doe Thomas, Chris Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beesla v. Seigel
as 3:2021cv05699
Plaintiff:
Manjinder Singh Beesla
Defendant:
Tom Seigel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. Bainbridge Mental Health
as 3:2021cv05641
Petitioner:
Tom Clegg Gibson
Respondent:
Bainbridge Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dalluge v. Lawson et al
as 2:2021cv00590
Respondent:
Lori Lawson and Tom Jones
Petitioner:
Amel Dalluge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
