Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Aversano v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2013cv00252
Plaintiff:
Alexander T Aversano
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cannon et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2012cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jonah Cannon , James Kaen and Rachel Wassel
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kurnick v. Starbucks Corporation, et al
as 2:2011cv01985
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Kurnick
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starbucks Corporation v. Continental Terminals, Inc.
as 2:2010cv01838
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
Continental Terminals, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starbucks Corporation v. Twohig
as 2:2009cv01404
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
Paul Twohig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Lalli v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2009cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joseph Lalli, Joseph Lalli, Joseph Lalli and others
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Krottner v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2009cv00216
Plaintiff:
Laura Krottner, Laura Krottner and Laura Krottner
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADT Security Services Inc v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2008cv00905
Plaintiff:
ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Security Services Inc
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Starbucks Corporation v. ADT Security Services Inc
as 2:2008cv00900
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Security Services Inc
Counter Claimant:
ADT Security Services Inc and ADT Security Services Inc
Counter Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
