Cases 31 - 40 of 53
Eko Brands v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00894
Plaintiff:
Eko Brands. LLC
Defendant:
Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises Inc and Adrian Rivera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Q Nightclub and Lounge et al v. City of Vancouver et al
as 3:2017cv05262
Plaintiff:
Q Nightclub and Lounge , Adrian Kallimanis and Jose Parra
Defendant:
City of Vancouver , C-Tran, Rick Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sassen Vanelsoo v. Rogers et al
as 3:2016cv05574
Plaintiff:
Adrian G Sassen Vanelsoo
Defendant:
Ronald Rogers, C Stephen Sutton, Susan German and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Contreras-Rebollar v. Key
as 3:2015cv05471
Petitioner:
Adrian Contreras-Rebollar
Respondent:
U.S.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maupin v. Glebe
as 3:2015cv05431
Petitioner:
Adrian Joseph Maupin
Respondent:
Pat Glebe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eko Brands v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00522
Plaintiff:
Eko Brands
Defendant:
Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises Inc and Adrian Rivera
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Steadman v. Greentree Servicing, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00854
Plaintiff:
Adrian Steadman
Defendant:
Greentree Servicing, LLC and Northwest Trustee Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The United States of America et al v. H2O Apartments, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01837
Plaintiff:
Abraham Jimenez, Fidel Castro, Cruz Laureano and others
Defendant:
David Jon Leenders, Developers Surety and Indemnity Company, H2O Apartments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
