Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Roberts v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00222
Plaintiff:
Seth M Roberts
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pavlik v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00154
Plaintiff:
Seth Pavlik
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Germain v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2013cv01239
Plaintiff:
Seth Germain
Defendant:
City of Seattle and Daina Boggs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Harris v. Nail Touch Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00910
Plaintiff:
Seth D Harris
Defendant:
Hong Pham and Victoria Phan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harris v. Jie et al
as 2:2013cv00877
Plaintiff:
Seth D Harris
Defendant:
Huang "Jackie" Jie , Zhao "Jenny" Zeng Hong , Pacific Coast Foods, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00860
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tacey Goss P.S. v. Barnhart et al
as 2:2013cv00800
Plaintiff:
Tacey Goss P.S.
Defendant:
Donna Barnhart , Women's Health Developers Inc , Chicfit Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Harris v. Summit Drywall, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00683
Defendant:
Summit Drywall Inc and Thomas Kauzlarich
Plaintiff:
Seth D Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Harris v. Investment Management Recoveries, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00514
Plaintiff:
Seth D Harris
Defendant:
Investment Management Recoveries, Inc., Randall Goins, Laurel Delmore and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Scannell v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 2:2012cv00683
Plaintiff:
John R Scannell
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association, Board of Governors of WSBA, Russell M Aokii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
