Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Cox v. B&R Aerial Crop Care Inc et al
as 2:2024cv01462
Defendant:
B&R Aerial Crop Care Inc, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Shirley Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Government Employees Insurance Company v. Elenbaas et al
as 2:2023cv01786
Plaintiff:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Defendant:
Joseph Renier Elenbaas, Melanie W. Elenbaas, Keith L. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00273
Plaintiff:
Nelson Design Group, LLC
Defendant:
Obrock Cox PLLC, Beachfront Properties LLC, John Paul Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Nelson Design Group LLC v. Obrock Cox PLLC et al
as 2:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Nelson Design Group, LLC and Nelson Design Group LLC
Defendant:
Beachfront Properties LLC, John Paul Cox, David Danton and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cox v. Bennett
as 3:2023cv05036
Petitioner:
Brian Gleen Cox
Respondent:
Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mack et al v. MCG Health LLC
as 2:2022cv00935
Plaintiff:
JULIE MACK, JOANNE MULLINS and INGRID COX
Defendant:
MCG Health LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Bonds v. Brandt et al
as 3:2022cv05490
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel Traivon Bonds
Defendant:
Brandt, Emily Cox and Gregory L Greer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv05504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
