Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Liddell v. Carr et al
as 2:2023cv00818
Plaintiff:
Jesse E Liddell
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Clinton Bryant, Michelle Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Bryant et al
as 2:2023cv00285
Plaintiff:
Willie Lee Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Nicholas Bryant, John Doe and Milwaukee County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Shimek et al
as 2:2022cv01461
Plaintiff:
Kristopher DeWitt Mitchell
Defendant:
Peter Shimek, Jonathan Bussie, Sgt Kohlhoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hewlett v. Hill et al
as 1:2022cv01363
Plaintiff:
Damien Shontell Hewlett
Defendant:
Jason Hill, LT Bryant, LT Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yanick v. Bryant
as 2:2022cv01214
Petitioner:
Martin V Yanick, Jr
Respondent:
Clinton Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Page v. Burger
as 1:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Royel Page
Defendant:
Robert Gregory, Shawn Burger and Bryant Devalkenara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw et al v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Sergio Shaw, Marion Pattillo, Cleasan Dotson and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail, Milwaukee County Jail Administrator, Milwaukee County Jail Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Bryant
as 1:2022cv00021
Petitioner:
James E Anderson
Respondent:
Clinton Bryant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryant v. Noble
as 2:2021cv00936
Petitioner:
Tarance L Bryant
Respondent:
Jon Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Claypool v. Evers et al
as 2:2021cv00571
Defendant:
Angela Thompson, Austin J Korman, Kira Labby and others
Plaintiff:
Bryant K Claypool
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
