Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Gill v. Woelfel et al
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Jordan Woelfel, S Enneper, Alex Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Meyer et al
as 2:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Autumn Meyer, Liza Naumann, Joseph Teigen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith et al v. Warden et al
as 2:2022cv00330
Plaintiff:
Osuntoka Smith, Andre D Hansbrough, Toney Davis and others
Defendant:
Warden, D Blackburn, Justin Segerstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Kedzierski et al
as 2:2021cv01154
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Anna Kedzierski, Kevin Mauthe, Veronica Solecki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2020cv00974
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Kevin A Carr, Officer Benike and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Huber et al
as 2:2020cv00078
Defendant:
CO II O'Brien, Ms Maassen, Ms Gilles and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Duane Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. West et al
as 2:2019cv01400
Defendant:
Officer Heinon, Lt McClain, Jennifer McDermott and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lindell v. Greff et al
as 2:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Captain Core, Tanya Moon, Lt Jessie Schneider and others
Plaintiff:
Nate A Lindell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Aramark et al
as 2:2018cv00540
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, Thomas Hare, Outagamie County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gill v. Aramark et al
as 2:2018cv00226
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Aramark, Outagamie County Jail, Officer Finlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
