Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Lim v. Hellenbrand et al
as 2:2012cv00296
Plaintiff:
Khor Chin Lim
Defendant:
Marvin Hellenbrand , Scott Walker , Robert Cowles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frank et al v. Walker et al
as 2:2011cv01128
Plaintiff:
Ruthelle Frank , Carl Ellis , Justin Luft and others
Defendant:
Scott Walker , Thomas Barland , Gerald Nichol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hemphill v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2011cv00743
Plaintiff:
Dorothy A Hemphill
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee , Craig Ellis and Jane Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Lipinsh et al
as 2:2010cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L Ellis
Defendant:
Captain Lipinsh , Sgt Pischke and Captain Radtke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Malone, et al
as 2:2002cv00428
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L Ellis
Defendant:
Ronald Malone and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Malone, et al
as 2:2002cv00478
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L Ellis
Defendant:
Ronald Malone and Officer Buchamam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowers v. Jail Milw Cty
as 2:2001cv00975
Plaintiff:
David Elijah Bowers, Sr
Defendant:
Ellie Seymour , Mary Kay Schuknect , Charles E Fitzgerald, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parkland Venture LLC et al v. City of Muskego et al
as 2:2009cv00972
Plaintiff:
Parkland Venture LLC, Arthur D Dyer, Norman C Dryer, Jr and others
Defendant:
City of Muskego, City of Muskego, City of Muskego Community Development Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rulli v. CB Richard Ellis Inc
as 2:2009cv00289
Plaintiff:
John Rulli and John Rulli
Defendant:
CB Richard Ellis Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maus v. Greening et al
as 2:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
Brian A Maus
Defendant:
Bill Greening, Brad Hendricks, Diane Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
