Cases 61 - 70 of 650
Edmonson v. Haese et al
as 2:2023cv00515
Plaintiff:
Jason L Edmonson
Defendant:
Michelle Haese, Michael Radtke, Daniel LaVoie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fassbender v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Evan R Fassbender
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Tony Evers, Kirsten Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henderson v. Jackels
as 2:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
Daniel Henderson
Defendant:
Officer Jackels, Officer Buboltz, Unknown Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gill v. Meyer et al
as 2:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Autumn Meyer, Liza Naumann, Joseph Teigen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aumend v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Daniel David Aumend
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Stryker v. Cromwell
as 2:2023cv00139
Petitioner:
Robert C Stryker
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brown v. Toua et al
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jamaine Brown
Defendant:
PO Toua, Daniel Sutyak, Milwaukee Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Cromwell
as 2:2023cv00031
Petitioner:
Leon Garrett, Jr
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
