Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Harper v. Stevens et al
as 2:2024cv00694
Plaintiff:
Kevin O Harper
Defendant:
Christopher Stevens, John Kind, Dylon Radtke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forester-Hoare v. Freeman et al
as 2:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Sean Forester-Hoare
Defendant:
Dr Freeman, Dr Lavoie, Baier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zimmerman v. Baier et al
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Samuel Zimmerman
Defendant:
Cassandra Baier, Shane Garland, Ellen Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Shan v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
XIAOFEI SHAN
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hawkinson v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
David R Hawkinson
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Bureau of Health Services, Virginia H Trzbiatowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
