Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hicks v. West Allis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Kylik Hyshaumadeen Hicks
Defendant:
West Allis Police Department, Officer Cooper and Officer Cuello
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hicks v. Murray
as 2:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
Kylik Hyshaumadeen Hicks
Defendant:
Ashley J Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Milwaukee County Transport Service et al
as 2:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Florine Hicks
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Transport Service, Amalgamated Transit Union Local 998, Raymond Ma and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Borgen et al
as 2:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Desmond Hicks
Defendant:
James Borgen, Tyler Broderick, Kelly Schoebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Booman Still boomin (Authentic Empire)
as 2:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Tyriech Fabion Hicks
Defendant:
Booman Still boomin (Authentic Empire)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Steinke v. Witt et al
as 2:2021cv00696
Defendant:
Amber Aguilera, John Doe CO's, Cathryn Tyce and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J Steinke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiles et al v. Champagne et al
as 2:2021cv00061
Defendant:
Shirley Berger, Captain David Hicks, Dr Eugene P Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Robert H Dolgner, Devon Shumpert, Antonio McCarroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00885
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Perry Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hicks v. Lucas
as 2:2020cv00725
Petitioner:
Calvin Jesse Hicks
Respondent:
Earnell R Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
