Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bell v. Kozak et al
as 2:2018cv01150
Defendant:
John Luetscher, Jeffrey Pamenter, Nicole L Fumelle and others
Plaintiff:
Darcy D Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodvine v. Litscher et al
as 1:2017cv01223
Plaintiff:
Christopher Goodvine
Defendant:
Jon Litscher , Cathy Jess , Jim Schwochert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tad Lee Saunders
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Robbins v. Foster et al
as 2:2016cv01528
Plaintiff:
Shane T Robbins
Defendant:
Brian Foster , Captain Olson, Deputy Security Chief Saunders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan et al v. CSW Inc et al
as 1:2016cv01283
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Morgan , Clint Robinson , Paul Robinson and others
Defendant:
CSW Inc and Northern Concrete Construction Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Saunders v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv01600
Plaintiff:
Tad L Saunders
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Saunders v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00301
Plaintiff:
Michael J Saunders
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Scripture et al v. Linn et al
as 2:2009cv01054
Plaintiff:
Connie Scripture, Connie Scripture, Russell Scripture and others
Defendant:
Dennis E Linn, Dennis E Linn, Robert J Dzbinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schmitz v. Evan K Saunders MD SC et al
as 2:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
Sharon Schmitz and Sharon Schmitz
Defendant:
Evan K Saunders MD SC and Evan K Saunders
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
