Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Boyce v. DeHaan
as 2:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Ladarius Boyce
Respondent:
Suzanne DeHaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Darge v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv01201
Plaintiff:
Suzanne M Darge
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Walker v. Wisconsin Department of Health Services et al
as 2:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
De'Von L Walker
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Health Services, Wisconsin Resource Center, Suzanne Dehaan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Michael Gifford, by its Special Administrator, Suzanne Gifford v. Operating Engineers 139 Health Benefit Fund
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Estate of Michael Gifford, by its Special Administrator, Suzanne Gifford
Defendant:
Operating Engineers 139 Health Benefit Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Heroux v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv01104
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Heroux
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Carney v. Saul
as 2:2021cv00006
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Carney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Harper, Kevin v. Pollard, William et al
as 2:2020cv00424
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe Security Director, Suzanne Wendlant and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Omar Harper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01891
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
