Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Benitez-Diaz, Alberto et al v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00369
Petitioner:
Alberto Benitez-Diaz, Cesar Serrano-Nieto, Jairo Salazar-Dominguez and others
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz, Wilfredo v. Buesgen, Christopher
as 3:2023cv00107
Petitioner:
Wilfredo Diaz
Respondent:
Christopher Buesgen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Standard Process Inc. v. Diaz, Stephen et al
as 3:2020cv00373
Plaintiff:
Standard Process Inc.
Defendant:
Stephen Diaz and John Does (1-100)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Diaz, Jose v. Barker, Jamie
as 3:2019cv00184
Plaintiff:
Jose Diaz
Defendant:
Ms. Jamie Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00533
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2724
Macias, Claudia et al v. Mt. Olympus Resorts, LLC
as 3:2018cv00358
Plaintiff:
Claudia Macias , Fernando Diaz and Alani Diaz
Defendant:
Mt. Olympus Resorts, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dotel, Jose et al v. Dittaman, Michael et al
as 3:2016cv00755
Plaintiff:
Jose Dotel, Luis Davila-Diaz and Miguel A. Dotel Sierra
Defendant:
Michael Dittaman , Scott Anderson, Alfonso Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ciarpaglini, Robert et al v. City of Beloit et al
as 3:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Ciarpaglini and Marcos G. Diaz-Rodriguez
Defendant:
City of Beloit , Blaine Oxenreider , Brian Daugherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
