Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Rogers v. Relitz et al
as 3:2022cv00749
Plaintiff:
Caleb Joshua Rogers
Defendant:
Scott A. Relitz, Jane Cree, Keith Lovell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Rogers, Caleb v. Relitz, Scott et al
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Caleb Joshua Rogers
Defendant:
Scott A. Relitz, Deborah Relitz and Dennis G. Riley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Riley, Daron v. United States et al
as 3:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Daron E. Riley
Defendant:
United States, Veterans Administration and Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Riley, Daron v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Daron E. Riley
Defendant:
The United States of America, United States Department of Veterans Affairs and Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Ramirez, Gabriel v. State of Wisconsin, Dane County et al
as 3:2020cv01027
Defendant:
Deputy Zachary A. Sween, Deputy Lacey M. Kranski, B. Wiersma and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel G. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley, Jimmy v. Long, Brian et al
as 3:2020cv00736
Defendant:
Dr. Simcox, Jacob Zimmerman, Brian Long and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Riley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley, Jimmy et al v. Waterman, J.
as 3:2018cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Riley
Defendant:
J. Waterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adamzak, Chad et al v. Capstan Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00638
Plaintiff:
Chad Adamzak , James Berg , James Brown and others
Defendant:
Capstan Corporation, Northern Engineering Company, LLC and The Interlake Steamship Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Riley, Shawn v. Ewing
as 3:2015cv00592
Plaintiff:
Shawn Riley
Defendant:
Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley, Brian v. Colvin, Carolyn
as 3:2014cv00657
Plaintiff:
Brian Riley
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
