Cases 121 - 130 of 908
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Wyer v. Sheppard et al
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Erik Wyer
Defendant:
William Sheppard and The Town of Ridgeley, WV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Strasburg v. Mineral County Magistrate's Office et al
as 3:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
William Strasburg
Defendant:
Mineral County Magistrate's Office, Charles R. Gulbronson, Augusta, WV Regional Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disablities Act
Strasburg v. Hardy County, WV, et al
as 2:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
William Strasburg
Defendant:
Hardy County, WV and Moorefield Police Department, Hardy County, WV and Moorefield Police Department
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Linger v. Sheetz
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Dale Wayne Linger
Defendant:
Sheetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Poole v. State of West Virginia
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Vincent Poole
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
