Cases 21 - 30 of 907
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Dankwa et al
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Brent Clark
Defendant:
Doctor Vibeke Dankwa and Patricia Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Folse v. McCuskey et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Jay Folse
Defendant:
John McCuskey, Jr., G. Russell Rollyson, Jr. and Michelle Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Belkadi v. Mayle
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Massinissa Belkadi
Defendant:
C.C. Mayle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Black v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar Black
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Corn et al v. City Of Wheeling et al
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Heather Corn and House of Hagar Catholic Worker House
Defendant:
City Of Wheeling and Robert Herron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
State of West Virginia v. Jones
as 1:2023cv00102
In Re:
T.J., Aa. J., A. J. and others
Plaintiff:
State of West Virginia
Defendant:
Emmanuel Jones
Interested Party:
Shaquayla Jones, Tamra Beckwith and Amy Farrar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
