Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Jones v. State Police Department et al
as 2:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones
Defendant:
State Police Department and Buckhannon Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacques v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Jacques
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Louis David Janssen and William L. Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
West Virgina Parents for Religious Freedom et al v. Christiansen et al
as 5:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
West Virgina Parents for Religious Freedom, Andrew Waldron, Pator Chris Figaretti and others
Defendant:
Dr. Matthew Christiansen, Belinda Moss and Mindy Wilson
Amicus Curiae:
West Virginia Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Corder v. Wilhelm et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Deputy William Wilhelm, Pete Dougherty, Jefferson County Sherriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jason Corder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. City of Ranson, West Virginia et al
as 3:2020cv00221
Defendant:
William Roper, Robbie R. Roberts, Ranson City Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Orem et al v. Gillmore et al
as 3:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
John W. Orem and Sher Orem
Defendant:
Matthew D. Gillmore and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
