Cases 31 - 40 of 118
Gill v. Antonelli et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
State of Maryland, West Virginia, Bryan Antonelli and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. State of West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeal et al
as 5:2020cv00094
Defendant:
Department of Correction, St. Marys Correctional Center, Governor Office and others
Plaintiff:
Clarke D. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clervrain v. Hoover et al
as 3:2020cv00068
Defendant:
United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, State of Hawaii Office of the Secretary and others
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Tim Hot, Judy Goontz and State of West Virginia
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Cecil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cecil v. State of West Virginia
as 5:2020cv00042
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Cecil
Defendant:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owl Feather-Gorbey v. State of West Virginia
as 3:2019cv00165
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Petitioner:
Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Osburn v. State of West Virginia
as 3:2019cv00126
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Petitioner:
Timothy Mark Osburn, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Field v. State of West Virginia et al
as 3:2019cv00089
Defendant:
County of Marion, Trooper Timothy Morris, Jeffery Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Preston Field, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Smith et al
as 2:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Neil Williams
Defendant:
Scott Smith and West Virginia Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hess v. State of West Virginia
as 1:2018cv00223
Petitioner:
Michael D. Hess
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and John Sheeley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
