Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kokinda v. Foster et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jason Steven Kokinda
Defendant:
Cprl. T.H. Foster, Ptlm. K.A. Shiflett, Cprl. S.P. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Justice et al
as 5:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Greene
Defendant:
Randolph County, Jim Justice, Betsy C. Jividen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greene v. Feaster et al
as 5:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Greene
Defendant:
Sidney Feaster, Governor Jim Justice, Randolph County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Shiflet et al
as 3:2020cv00191
Plaintiff:
Tony Jerome Walton
Defendant:
Tom Harlem, Rick Haddix, Brian Shiflet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Shiflet et al
as 5:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Tom Harlem, Rick Haddix, Brian Shiflet and others
Plaintiff:
Tony J. Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curran v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2018cv00042
Plaintiff:
John Francis Curran, III
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix, J. Ware, Richard Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stephens v. City of Parkersburg Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Stephens
Defendant:
City of Parkersburg Sheriff Dept., Correction Officer John Allen, Correction Officer Tom Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Platts v. Buchanan et al
as 2:2013cv00042
Plaintiff:
James C. Platts
Defendant:
Mary Beth Buchanan, John Jeffrey Miller, Harold Stanton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Winning v. Hoke et al
as 1:2011cv00094
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Winning
Defendant:
Adrian F. Hoke, Tom Chenoweth, Debbie Contral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redman v. Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney et al
as 1:2010cv00021
Plaintiff:
Crandale Redman
Defendant:
Jackson County Prosecuting Attorney and Tom Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
