Cases 191 - 200 of 14,143
Black v. Biden
as 1:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar Black
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Law v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Justin Law
Respondent:
H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cottrille v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Amanda Dawn Cottrille
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gautreaux v. Warden, SPC Hazelton
as 5:2024cv00023
Petitioner:
Jase Depaul Gautreaux
Respondent:
Warden, SPC Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hughes v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Maria Hughes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bohon v. Walmart Stores East, LP et al
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Robin Lynn Bohon and Daniel Gonzales
Defendant:
Walmart Stores East, LP, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
James v. Lovett
as 5:2024cv00012
Petitioner:
Calvin James
Respondent:
S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Mey v. Pintas et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
William Pintas, P&M Law Firm, LLC, P&M Law Firm (PR), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mallo v. Maston et al
as 5:2054cv00053
Plaintiff:
Farris E. Mallo
Defendant:
Russell Maston, Mrs. Kristen Nichols, Mrs. Nichols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
