Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Rauch v. Powl et al
as 3:2014cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jordan Lawrence Rauch
Defendant:
Powl, James Shelds, Niki Seifert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slusarek v. John Riley Company, LLC et al
as 5:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Slusarek
Defendant:
John Riley Company, LLC , John Riley , Jordan Parker and others
Counter_claimant:
State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Michael B. Slusarek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Neel v. Jordan
as 3:2013cv00142
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Neel
Defendant:
Philip B. Jordan, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Dunlap v. Perdue
as 1:2013cv00209
Petitioner:
Jordan Michael Dunlap
Respondent:
R. A. Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dunlap v. Plumley
as 1:2013cv00159
Petitioner:
Jordan Michael Dunlap
Respondent:
Marvin Plumley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. Glenville State College et al
as 1:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
Amanda Smith
Defendant:
Glenville State College, Daniel Bell, Jayde Layne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jordan et al v. Entertainment of the Eastern Panhandle, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00019
Plaintiff:
Arielle Jordan and Patrice Ruffin
Defendant:
Entertainment of the Eastern Panhandle, Inc. , The Legz Club, Inc. , Legz Morgan Town, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Entertainment of the Eastern Panhandle, Inc. , The Legz Club, Inc. , Legz Morgan Town, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Arielle Jordan and Patrice Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Nautilus Insurance Company v. Jordan et al
as 1:2007cv00022
Plaintiff:
Nautilus Insurance Company
Defendant:
Joseph B. Jordan, Joseph B. Jordan, Leonard A. Konchesky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
