Cases 31 - 40 of 693
Kroll v. Sheppard et al
as 3:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Cody Kroll
Defendant:
William Sheppard and The Town of Ridgeley, WV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Milliron v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
William Milliron
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00211
Petitioner:
Mr. Charles E. Williams
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00210
Petitioner:
Antwan Williams
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jacques v. City of Bridgeport et al
as 1:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. Jacques
Defendant:
City of Bridgeport, Louis David Janssen and William L. Townsend
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jones v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00178
Petitioner:
Richard William Jones
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Lovett et al
as 5:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Dwight Williams
Respondent:
S. Lovett, K. Bigart, W. Sines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
O'Brien v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00121
Petitioner:
William O'Brien
Respondent:
Ms. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Seckman et al v. Antero Resources Corporation
as 5:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Seckman, Charles Anderson, Gail Anderson and others
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Hedrick v. Marshell (sic) et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Tanner Ray Hedrick
Defendant:
William K. Marshell (sic), III, Shelby Searls, L.T.C. Stove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
