Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Cicchiello v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joan Cicchiello
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Lovett, Warden Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Cicchiello v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Joan Cicchiello
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Warden Lovett, Warden Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bennett v. Remco, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
Charles Bennett
Defendant:
Remco, Inc. and Retail Business Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Underwood v. Sayre et al
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
William Owen Underwood
Defendant:
D. T. Sayre, N. G. Elbon, T. Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritchey v. Sayre et al
as 5:2022cv00245
Plaintiff:
Francie Irvin Ritchey
Defendant:
D.T. Sayre, Elkins Police Department and Chief T. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. United States of American (sic)
as 3:2022cv00098
Petitioner:
Jonathan Frederick Bennett
Respondent:
United States of American (sic)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bennett et al v. Vehapi et al
as 5:2021cv00008
Defendant:
Vebi Vehapi and MS Transport, LLC
Plaintiff:
Russell Bennett and Barbara Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00157
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 5:2019cv00147
Petitioner:
Holly Neil Bennett
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Shy v. Kissel et al
as 1:2018cv00153
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical, Prime Care Medical-Eastern Regional Jail, Jennifer Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alexander Shy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
