Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Cox et al v. First Community Bank
as 5:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Tracy Cox and Dennis Cox
Defendant:
First Community Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Cox v. Dalton et al
as 1:2021cv00004
Plaintiff:
William Cox
Defendant:
Aaron Dalton, The City of Westover and Justice Carver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright et al v. Antero Resources Corporation
as 1:2020cv00222
Plaintiff:
Patricia Susan Wright, Richard L. Armstrong, Patrick Michael Wright and others
Defendant:
Antero Resources Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox v. Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company et al
as 2:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Armstrong Hardwood Flooring Company, Blair Louk and Steve Swecker
Plaintiff:
David Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No.(s). WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A et al
as 1:2018cv00089
Defendant:
Rover Tract No.(s). WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A , Gregory Brian Cox, Diana Lynne Knight and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Vance, et al. v. DirecTV, LLC et al
as 5:2017cv00179
Defendant:
AC1 Communications, Michael Asghari, IQ Marketing 2, Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey, Craig Cunningham, Stewart Abramson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cox v. Saad
as 3:2017cv00102
Petitioner:
Antquint L Cox
Respondent:
Jennifer Saad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cox v. Wilson
as 2:2016cv00073
Petitioner:
Clinton D. Cox
Respondent:
David R. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cox v. Reubenstein (sic) et al
as 3:2015cv00055
Plaintiff:
Robert Cox
Defendant:
Tim (sic) Reubenstein (sic), Dr. Policarpio, Patrick Mirands and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hagan v. Scott et al
as 2:2014cv00032
Plaintiff:
Wayne Hagan
Defendant:
Robert Scott, John Cox, Samuel Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
