Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Richison v. Chapman et al
as 5:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Richison
Defendant:
CO Aaron Chapman, CO Joel Hammer, CO Ashley Husk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapman v. Morgantown Operations, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Chapman
Defendant:
Morgantown Operations, LLC doing business as The Crossing at Morgantown doing business as Harmony at Morgantown, Mark Terry and Morgantown Operations, LLC doing business as The Crossings at Morgantown doing business as Harmony at Morgantown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Chapman v. Bowers
as 5:2021cv00132
Petitioner:
William Chapman
Respondent:
F.J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A et al
as 1:2017cv00016
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s) WV-DO-SHB-009.972-TAR-1A, Agnes E. Poe, Elizabeth A. Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chapman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2012cv00146
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Chapman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chapman v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
as 1:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
Mary Suzzanne Chapman
Defendant:
Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Chapman Corporation
as 1:2012cv00085
Plaintiff:
Shaun Scott
Defendant:
Chapman Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
