Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Lanham v. Sandy et al
as 3:2019cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Lanham
Defendant:
Michael Martin, Jeff S. Sandy, Sherry Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00099
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHC-039.000-ROW AND WV-DO-SHC-039.310-ROW, Audrey J. Baltoff, Frances Mae Musgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Brookover et al v. Gilmer County et al
as 1:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Samantha Brookover and Amanda Abramovich
Defendant:
Gilmer County, Debbie Allen and Jean Butcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Harper v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2017cv00012
Plaintiff:
Debbie Harper
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Harding v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2016cv00173
Plaintiff:
Smitty Harding
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Karen Pszczolkowski, Cecelia Janiszewski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Rubenstein et al
as 3:2015cv00120
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Taylor
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Patrick Mirandy, Debbie Hissam and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abbott v. Yurcina et al
as 3:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Ricky Abbott
Defendant:
William Yurcina, Dr. Hahn, Debbie Minnix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redleski v. Plumley et al
as 1:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Douglas Andrew Redleski
Defendant:
Marvin C. Plumley, Debbie Hissom, David Proctor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Smith et al
as 2:2015cv00010
Petitioner:
Gary West
Respondent:
Associate Warden Smith and Debbie J. Lohr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rogers v. Proctor et al
as 2:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Rogers
Defendant:
Dr. David Proctor, Mark Baker, Tristan Tenney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
