Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Macedo-Flores v. Compton et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Austreberta Macedo-Flores
Defendant:
Ms. Compton, M. Doyle and Officer Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rover Pipeline LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11 et al
as 5:2018cv00076
Plaintiff:
Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO(S). WV-TY-SHC-001.000-ROW; WV-TY-SHC-002.000-ROW; and WV-TY-SHC-002.971-TAR-11, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Clay Stubbs, The Heirs, Successors, and Assigns of Stella W. Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Bates v. Saad et al
as 5:2016cv00161
Plaintiff:
Donald Choya Bates
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, R. Mulac, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lancaster v. Todd et al
as 1:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
J. Todd, Artrip, B. Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bates v. Saad et al
as 1:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Donald Choya Bates
Defendant:
Jennifer Saad, R. Mulac, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00109
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Burton v. Doyle
as 5:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Bobby E. Burton, Jr.
Defendant:
Larry G. Doyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Doyle
as 3:2014cv00040
Petitioner:
Bobby E. Burton, Jr.
Respondent:
Larry G. Doyle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Noble Energy, Inc. v. Griffith
as 5:2013cv00101
Plaintiff:
Noble Energy, Inc.
Defendant:
Doyle Griffith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
