Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 169.19 acres of land, more or less, in Doddridge, Ritchie, Tyler and Wetzel Counties, West Virginia et al
as 1:2018cv00008
Defendant:
Jack J. Cunningham, Jerry Dane Jobes, Henry E. Kelley, II and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Bennett v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 5:2019cv00147
Petitioner:
Holly Neil Bennett
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Smith et al
as 2:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Neil Williams
Defendant:
Scott Smith and West Virginia Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v United States of America
as 1:2016cv00125
Petitioner:
Holly Neil Bennett
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Mooring Capital Fund, LLC v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2015cv00138
Plaintiff:
Mooring Capital Fund, LLC
Defendant:
Neil J. Sullivan, II , Judy S. Sullivan and Jennifer S. Maghan
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Long v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
Neil Gifford Long
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Long v. Policarpio et al
as 2:2014cv00010
Plaintiff:
Neil Gifford Long
Defendant:
Dionisio Enriquez Policarpio, MD, Ralph E. Price, Patrick Mirandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Ballard
as 2:2013cv00054
Petitioner:
Neil Williams
Respondent:
David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buhro et al v. Dent et al
as 5:2013cv00081
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Buhro and Shannon Davis
Defendant:
Sara Dent, Neil Fowkes, Robert Safreed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
