Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia
Stutler v. Tate
as 5:2024cv00103
Petitioner: Aric Jason Stutler
Respondent: Ditmaus Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Coleman v. Tate et al
as 3:2023cv00115
Plaintiff: Michael Coleman
Defendant: Superintendent DiDymus Tate, Superintendet Travis Myers, Correctional Officer Scott Soltysiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newell v. Tate et al
as 5:2022cv00277
Plaintiff: Leroy Lee Newell, Jr.
Defendant: DiDymus Tate, Prime Care Health Service, Lt. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Tate
as 3:2022cv00160
Plaintiff: Jesse Colin Campbell
Defendant: Didymus Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurt v. Tate We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: Steven R. Hurt
Defendant: D. Tate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Advance Stores Company, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00207
Defendant: Advance Stores Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: Russell David Tate, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rover Pipeline LLC v. Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-011.510-ROW and WV-DO-SHB-013.000-ROW et al
as 1:2018cv00084
Plaintiff: Rover Pipeline LLC
Defendant: Rover Tract No(s). WV-DO-SHB-011.510-ROW and WV-DO-SHB-013.000-ROW, Tobey Lynn Nutt, KAJ, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Doleman v. John Doe Administrator et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00171
Plaintiff: Raheim Doleman
Defendant: John Doe Administrator, Sgt. Bullock, Jim Oxford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warren v. Tate et al
as 5:2016cv00036
Plaintiff: Paul W. Warren/Strang
Defendant: Rebecca Tate, Patrick Wilson, Scott Shough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?