General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,772
Charlton v. Straughn
as 2:2023cv00743
Petitioner: Timothy Charlton
Respondent: Shawn Straughn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Merchant v. Gore
as 1:2023cv00796
Petitioner: Brian Merchant
Respondent: Charles Gore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neely v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00752
Petitioner: Lisa F. Neely
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lafond v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00718
Petitioner: Juvonta Lafond
Respondent: FCI Beckley Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Howard v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00755
Petitioner: William Howard, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Urban v. State of West Virginia We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00710
Plaintiff: Aaron Jimmie Urban
Defendant: State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cuevas-Holguin v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00804
Petitioner: Jose Cuevas-Holguin
Respondent: E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Torres v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2023cv00792
Petitioner: Juan Torres
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mid-Atlantic Regional Director, Associate Warden Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Khadem v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00661
Petitioner: Roshanak Khadem
Respondent: United States of America and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Small v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00658
Petitioner: Suresh H. Small
Respondent: Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?