General Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 71 - 80 of 1,767
Rankins v. Heckard We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00558
Petitioner: Jeremy Rankins
Respondent: Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Robbs v. Warden
as 5:2023cv00559
Petitioner: Jermaul Quinchon Robbs
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00593
Petitioner: Javier Martinez-Turcio
Respondent: Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Moore v. Ames
as 2:2023cv00634
Petitioner: Juan Moore
Respondent: Donnie Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00600
Petitioner: Stephanie L. Carpenter
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Osborne v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00531
Petitioner: Robert Louis Gray Osborne
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cummings v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00560
Petitioner: Matthew Cummings
Respondent: Warden Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00527
Petitioner: Ruben Rodriguez
Respondent: United States of America and Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. Holzapfel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00617
Petitioner: Anthony Harris
Respondent: W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Grant v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00586
Petitioner: Tanya Parrish Grant
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?