Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Johnson v. James B. Nutter & Company et al
as 3:2019cv00856
Defendant:
Reverse Mortgage Funding LLC, Terra Abstract Trustee West Virginia, Inc. and James B. Nutter & Company
Plaintiff:
Tammy Johnson and James B. Nutter & Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1691
Parsons et al v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00649
Plaintiff:
Roderick D. Parsons, Chelsea R. Miller, Pamela Doss and others
Defendant:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC and Columbia Pipeline Group Services Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 466.19 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Mason, Putnam, Roane and Wirt Counties, West Virginia et al
as 2:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
466.19 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Mason, Putnam, Roane and Wirt Counties, West Virginia, Mary Lou Harshbarger , Sharon Juanita Davis and others
Consol_defendant:
93.48 Acres of Land, More or Less, in Cabell, Jackson, Putnam and Wirt Counties, West Virginia, Marilyn D. Ramey , Town of Milton and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Nutter v. Federal Emergency Management Agency
as 5:2017cv04248
Plaintiff:
Tristan B. Nutter
Defendant:
Federal Emergency Management Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4072
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C. v. An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, WV et al
as 2:2017cv04214
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, L.L.C.
Defendant:
An Easement to Construct, Operate and Maintain a 42-Inch Gas Transmission Line Across Properties in the Counties of Nicholas, Greenbrier, Monroe, Summers, Braxton, Harrison, Lewis, Webster, and Wetzel, D. Lane McMillion, Dale L. McMillion and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Sigman et al v. CSX Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv13328
Plaintiff:
Brandy Sigman , Deborah Abbott , Harley Cheyenna Abbott and others
Defendant:
CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Glover v. Burgess et al
as 3:2015cv09158
Plaintiff:
Alex Glover
Defendant:
Joda Burgess and B&B Holdings, PLLC
Counter_claimant:
Joda Burgess and B&B Holdings, PLLC
Counter_defendant:
Alex Glover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. 953.209 Acres, More or Less, in Monroe County Located on Parcel Identification No. 03-21-53.2 et al
as 1:2014cv09250
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
953.209 Acres, More or Less, in Monroe County Located on Parcel Identification No. 03-21-53.2, Virginia C. Alexander, Jacqueline L. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
LBR Holdings, LLC v. Poulos, et al
as 1:2013cv01081
Plaintiff:
LBR Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Gregory G. Poulos , Jason G. Poulos , Pamela F. Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Harrison et al v. Hosch et al
as 2:2008cv00943
Plaintiff:
George Harrison, George Harrison, George Harrison and others
Defendant:
E. John Hosch, E. John Hosch, Centre Equities, Inc. and others
Third Party Plaintiff:
Centre Equities, Inc., Centre Equities, Inc., Three Rivers Companies, LLC and others
Third Party Defendant:
Office of the Fayette County Planning Department, Office of the Fayette County Planning Department, Timothy Richardson and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Peter S. Lepore, Peter S. Lepore, Irena Lepore and others
Cross Claimant:
United Bank, Inc., United Bank, Inc., United Bank, Inc. and others
Cross Defendant:
E. John Hosch, E. John Hosch, Centre Equities, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Centre Equities, Inc., Centre Equities, Inc., Three Rivers Companies, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Office of the Fayette County Planning Department, Office of the Fayette County Planning Department, Timothy Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
