Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv13368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stanley v. City of Hurricane et al
as 3:2015cv12537
Plaintiff:
William Stanley
Defendant:
City of Hurricane , T. W. Barker , R. E. Poe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv09655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks et al v. Oglesby et al
as 2:2015cv08450
Plaintiff:
Tammi Hicks and Richard Dale Kohler
Defendant:
M. L. Oglesby, II, R. L. Mefford, S. T. Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Encore Management Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv28101
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Encore Management Company, Inc., Perkins Parke Limited Partnership, Anthony James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dolson et al v. Racing Corporation of West Virginia et al
as 2:2014cv26231
Plaintiff:
William T. Dolson and Aymie M. Dolson
Defendant:
Racing Corporation of West Virginia , City of Nitro Police Department and City of Nitro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tardy et al v. City of Nitro, West Virginia et al
as 2:2014cv16876
Plaintiff:
Jared Patrick Tardy and A. T.
Defendant:
City of Nitro, West Virginia, D. S. Bays, Jarrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Depue et al
as 2:2014cv16854
Plaintiff:
Albert Richards
Defendant:
B. J. Depue , R. T. Davis and City of Parkersburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Compton v. Ball et al
as 2:2013cv15340
Plaintiff:
William T. Compton
Defendant:
Kevin E. Ball, Max J. Mounts, Michael J. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ward v. Bartram et al
as 3:2012cv01511
Plaintiff:
Mark Delane Ward
Defendant:
Shawn P. Bartram, Alfred E. Ferguson, West Virginia State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
