Cases 71 - 80 of 1,546
Staples, Bey v. Parsons et al
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. Parsons, Sargent Kevin Allen, W. M. Tanzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00385
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. United States Treasury Department
as 2:2023cv00359
Plaintiff:
Lillie Mae Williams
Defendant:
United States Treasury Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller v. W. V. Department of Health and Human Resources
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Mrs. Inca Miller and William Miller
Defendant:
WV Department Health Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCoy v. Kanawha County Board of Education et al
as 2:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Chelena J. McCoy
Defendant:
Kanawha County Board of Education and Dr. Thomas F. Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Long v. City of Princeton, West Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Franklin Long, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Princeton, West Virginia, Tim Gray and Kenneth Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howe v. Bryson
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Natasha Howe
Defendant:
Kent Bryson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
